Judge: California Ride-Hailing Law Is Unconstitutional – Patch.com

By BRIAN MELLEY Associated PressL. a., CA — A decide Friday struck down a California Pollmeasure t…….

npressfetimg-3316.png

By BRIAN MELLEY Associated Press

L. a., CA — A decide Friday struck down a California Pollmeasure that exempted Uber and completely different app-based mostly journey-hailing and supply providers from a state regulation requiring drivers to be categorized as staff eligible for advantages and job protections.

Alameda County Superior Courtroom Judge Frank Roesch dominated that Proposition 22 was unconstitutional.
Voters accredited the measure in November after Uber, Lyft and completely different providers spent $200 million in its favor, making it The Costliest Pollmeasure in state historic previous.

Uber said it deliberate to attraction, Establishing a wrestle That would probably Discover your self Inside the California Supreme Courtroom.

“This ruling ignores The will of the overwhelming majority of California voters and defies each logic and the regulation,” agency spokesman Noah Edwardsen said. “You Do not Want to take our phrase for it: California’s lawyer widespread strongly defended Proposition 22’s constitutionality On this very case.”

He said the measure will stay in strain pending the attraction.

The decide sided with three drivers and the Service Employees Worldwide Union in a regulationsuit that argued the measure improperly eliminated the state Legislature’s capability to grant staff The biggest to entry to the state staff’ compensation program.

“For two years, drivers have been saying that democracy Can’t be purchased. And right now’s choice reveals they have been proper,” said Bob Schoonover, president of the SEIU California State Council.

Proposition 22 shielded app-based mostly journey-hailing and supply corporations from a labor regulation that required such providers to deal with drivers as staff And by no means unbiased contractors, who don’t Want to acquire advantages Similar to paid sick depart or unemployment insurance coverage.

Uber and Lyft threatened To go away the state if voters rejected the measure.

Labor spent about $20 million to problem the proposition.

The state Supreme Courtroom initially declined To Take heed to the case in February — primarily on procedural grounds — however left open The potential of a decrease court problem.